In Re Griffith’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2008
4 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Spevack v. Klein · Scalza v. United States · Ex Parte Thompson · Ex Parte Griffith · In Re Fite
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No person heretofore or hereafter admitted to practice law in Alabama,, shall “‡ * * “16. Introduce or offer to introduce-any testimony which he knows to be false or forged.” (239 Ala. XXIV)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““36. No person licensed to practice law in the courts of the State of Alabama shall be guilty of any conduct unbecoming an attorney at law.” (239 Ala. XXV)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.