Lackey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2019
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission · Alford v. State · Cary v. State · Rector v. State · Sweatt v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by the defense was no reason to allow this type of evidence before the jury. The circuit judge recognized that after the fact. The error can only be cured by a new trial. (Citations omitted.) Appellant argues that likewise in his case, the evidence of other victims mentioned by Investigator Dehart during the guilt phase was extremely prejudicial and can be cured only by ordering a new trial. He maintains that in failing to do so, the circuit court abused its discretion. We note the State's response that the comment by Investigator Dehart that Ms. Stewart gave police”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Free v. State · Walker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.