Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

283 Ark. 534

Walker v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 29, 1984

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1984-10-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1996

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-10-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Petitioner Billy Joe Walker was convicted in circuit court of theft by receiving and sentenced as a habitual offender to 30 years imprisonment. A fine of $15,000 was also imposed. He appealed the conviction to the Court of Appeals. Before the Court of Appeals rendered a decision, petitioner asked that the appeal be dismissed so that he could proceed under A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37. The Court of Appeals granted the motion, noting that petitioner would have to proceed in the Supreme Court for postconviction relief.

¶2Rule 37.2 (a) provides:

If the conviction in the original case was appealed to the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals, then no proceedings under this rule shall be entertained by the circuit court without permission of the Supreme Court.

¶3The rule does not specify whether “appealed” denotes simply filing a notice of appeal or denotes only those cases affirmed on appeal, but we interpret it to mean that a case must be affirmed before it becomes necessary to have our permission to proceed in circuit court. If an appeal is dismissed before final disposition, jurisdiction returns to the trial court to consider petitions for postconviction relief.

¶4Accordingly, since petitioner does not need our permission to file a Rule 37 petition in the circuit court, this petition is dismissed without prejudice.

¶5Petition dismissed.

/283/ark/534 · .json · Public domain