Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

283 F.2d 244

Docket No. 227 Misc.

George Saba and Lucas Nick Angelus v. United States

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-10-12

2 counsel of record

Relies on Zacarias v. United States · Delaney v. United States · Jolley v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1960-10-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1980

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

40196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

J. Edward Worton, Miami, Fla., for appellants.

Edith House, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This appeal is from an order denying motions of the appellants to suppress and for return of property seized, incident to the arrest of appellants for offenses presently being prosecuted by criminal information. The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the judgment of the district court was interlocutory and not appealable. We agree. See Zacarias v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 261 F.2d 416, certiorari denied 359 U.S. 935, 79 S.Ct. 650, 3 L.Ed.2d 637; Peterson v. United States, 1958, 5 Cir., 260 F.2d 265.

The appeal is therefore

¶2

Dismissed.

/283/f2d/244 · .json · Public domain