Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

283 F.2d 253

Docket No. 18308.

Dailey v. United States

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-10-21

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 1982

15 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Henderson v. United States · Kivette v. United States · Rodriguez v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1960-10-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Albert A. Roberts, East Point, Ga., for appellant.

Charles D. Read, Jr., U. S. Atty., E. Ralph Ivey, Asst. U. S. Atty., J. Robert Sparks, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before JONES, Circuit Judge, and HOOPER and JOHNSON, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The appellant and two others were convicted of Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421, violations. The sole ground of the appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty. The sordid story requires no retelling. The evidence justified the guilty verdict and the judgment thereon. Cf. Flanagan v. United States, 5 Cir., 1960, 277 F.2d 109. The judgment of the district court is

¶2

Affirmed.

/283/f2d/253 · .json · Public domain