Harry S. Getchell, Hollis Rinehart, William F. Powers and Francis E. Getchell v. United States

Nov 22, 1960.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-11-22

2 counsel of record

Relies on Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc. · Getchell v. United States · Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1960-11-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 1989 · most notably Engelhard Industries, Inc. v. Research Instrumental Corp. (1963), National Rejectors, Inc. v. Trieman (1966)

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Joseph P. Lieb, Judge.

Cody Fowler, Walter Humkey, Harvie S. DuVal, Emmett W. Kehoe, Miami, Fla., Paul Kickliter, Herbert S. Phillips, Tampa, Fla., Chester Bedell, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant.

James Guilmartin, U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The petition for rehearing in the above styled and numbered cause, 282 F.2d 681, is hereby

¶2

Denied.

¶3

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.

¶4

I dissent from the order denying the petition for rehearing. I am of the opinion that the rehearing should be granted and the original judgment of this Court be modified in accordance with the views expressed by me in my dissenting opinion.