¶1Guy L. Deano, Jr., Thomas H. Kings-mill, Jr., New Orleans, La., for appellants.
¶2Stanley A. Baron, New Orleans, La., for appellees.
¶3Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and JONES, Circuit Judges.
¶5The interesting facts of this case and the applicable law are fully set forth in the opinion of the District Court reported United States v. Peter, D.C.E.D.La. 1959, 178 F.Supp. 854. We find ourselves in full agreement with the views of the-District Court. The judgment is, therefore
¶6Affirmed.