Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 F.2d 725 - William B. Sullivan v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden, Etc.

William B. Sullivan v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden, Etc.’s Empirical Analysis

283 F.2d 725 · 1960

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2013

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

40196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Sullivan · United States of America Ex Rel. Sullivan v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison · People v. Sullivan · The United States of America Ex Rel. William B. Sullivan v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison, Represa, California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is no mechanism in federal civil procedure by which the relief requested, inspection, can be granted in the absence of a pending proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.