Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 F.2d 839 - Washburn v. Commissioner

Washburn v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2016
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2016

4 federal appellate ·

40196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 162

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Heininger · Cammarano v. United States · Old Mission Portland Cement Co. v. Helvering · Textile Mills Securities Corp. v. Commissioner · Schmidlapp v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The facts in the instant case come within the purview of Strauss 3 and Cammarano . Here the taxpayer expended money for the purpose of obtaining sufficient signatures to make possible the referendum of an existing state statute to the people under the same state constitutional provision involved in Strauss.... The taxpayer here argues that he expended these funds only for the purpose of securing signatures to make possible the referendum, and not for the promotion or defeat of legislation. But obviously he was doing it for the purpose of annulling the existing legislation. Having found this purpose as a fact, the Tax Court necessarily held the expenditures non-deductible under the specific provisions of the Treasury Regulations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.