Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 F.3d 1268 - Brooks v. Ashcroft

Brooks v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

283 F.3d 1268 · 2002

Citation profile

150
cited by 150 later decisions
May 2017
most recently cited

50 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Deboris Calcano-Martinezs v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 150 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Applicable provisions (2) Matters not subject to judicial review (C) Orders against criminal aliens Notwithstanding any other provision of law (statutory or nonstatutory), including section 2241 of Title 28, or any other habeas corpus provision ... no court shall have jurisdiction to review any final order of removal against an alien who is removable by reason of having committed a criminal offense covered by section 1182(a)(2) or 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) ... of this title....”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Classifications that distinguish among groups of aliens are subject to rational basis review, and will be found valid if not arbitrary or unreasonable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “we retain jurisdiction to determine only whether these conditions exist.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.