Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 F.3d 1350 - Stanley v. Principi

Stanley v. Principi’s Empirical Analysis

283 F.3d 1350 · 2002

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
May 2024
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2024

5 federal appellate ·

100200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Catlin v. United States · Williams v. Principi · Hayre v. West · Roberson v. Principi · Howard v. Gober

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] fee may not be charged, allowed, or paid for services of agents and attorneys with respect to services provided before the date on which the Board of Veterans’ Appeals first makes a final decision in the case. Such a fee may be charged, allowed, or paid in the case of services provided after such date only if an agent or attorney is retained with respect to such case before the end of the one-year period beginning on that date.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “VA clearly concluded that the definition of final decision on an issue must be liberal enough to allow attorneys' fees in reopening proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the perceived threat that agents or attorneys would charge excessive fees for their services”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.