Newmark v. Principi’s Empirical Analysis
283 F.3d 172 · 2002
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc. · Foss v. Foss · Los Angeles Unified School District v. Los Angeles NAACP · In re Rivera
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is incumbent upon courts to read each statutory provision as having meaning, and to construe the statute so the `meaning of each word inform[s] the others and all in their aggregate tak[e] their purport from the setting in which they are used.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mitchell v. Horn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.