Hartman v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Allen v. Rc Lee · Allen v. Rc Lee

2. “[d]ue process requirements may be satisfied if a defendant receives actual notice of the charges against him, even if the indictment or information is deficient”; concluding that defective indictment did not violate defendant's Sixth Amendment right because defendant was made fully aware of charges and potential punishment during guilty plea proceedings); Fawcett v. Bablitch, 962 F.2d 617, 618 (7th Cir.1992) (concluding that defective state charging document does not violate due process unless”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 461 F. Supp. 2d 112 - Alston v. Donnelly

3. “conduct an independent review of the record and the applicable law to determine whether the result reached by the state court contravenes or unreasonably applies clearly established federal law.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Daniels v. Lee