Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 F.3d 328 - Aj McNulty Company Inc v. Secretary of Labor

Aj McNulty Company Inc v. Secretary of Labor’s Empirical Analysis

283 F.3d 328 · 2002

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
May 2020
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2003), AJP Construction, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor (2004)

13 federal appellate · 2 district ·

190200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 660 (§ 11 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970)

Relies on Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala · United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc. · McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co. · Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · William G. McBride v. Merrell Dow and Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an Ohio Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[B]ecause this point appears for the first time in the company's reply brief, we will not consider it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “free from recognized hazards that are ... likely to cause death or serious physical harm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`done voluntarily with either an intentional disregard of, or plain indifference to, the Act's requirements.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.