Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 F.3d 726 - Proctor v. Cockrell

Proctor v. Cockrell’s Empirical Analysis

283 F.3d 726 · 2002

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2022

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

60200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Miller v. California · Marks v. United States · Bouie v. City of Columbia · Collins v. Youngblood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “where [the alteration] is ‘unexpected and indefensible by reference to the law which had been expressed prior to the conduct in issue’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “deprive him of a substantial right involved in his liberty”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.