Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 F. Supp. 58 - Farrell v. Ignatius

283 F. Supp. 58 - Farrell v. Ignatius’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1990
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)

Relies on New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. Scanlon · Warren v. Arzt · In re the Arbitration between Children's Dress, Infant's Wear, Housedress & Bathrobe Makers' Union, Local 91 & Frankow Manufacturing Co. · 122 F. Supp. 321 - In Re Market Basket, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An action may not be started by securing an order to show cause and serving it____ To commence an action, it is necessary that the Rules of Civil Procedure be complied with, that a complaint be filed, a summons issued, and service made as prescribed in the Rules. Any order to show cause would have to be ancillary to an action then pending.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.