283 F. Supp. 2d 1128 - Resnick v. Rowe’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““[a] contract with an effect in the forum state does not, by itself, automatically establish the minimum contacts necessary for the exercise of personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant. Burger King, 471 U.S. at 478 , 105 S.Ct. 2174 . Instead, a court must examine the circumstances surrounding the contract in determining whether there have been the required minimum contacts. Accordingly, this court examines “prior negotiations and contemplated future consequences, along with the terms of the contract and the parties’ actual course of dealing.” See id. at 479 , 105 S.Ct. 2174 . “Parties who ‘reach out beyond one state and create continuing relationships and obligations with citizens of another state’ are subject to regulation and sanctions in the other State for the consequences of their activities.” Id. at 473 , 105 S.Ct. 2174 (quoting Travelers Health Ass’n v. Virginia, 339 U.S. 643, 647 , 70 S.Ct. 927 , 94 L.Ed. 1154 (1950)). “Thus, if the defendant directly solicits business in the forum state, the resulting transactions will probably constitute the deliberate transaction of doing business invoking the benefits of the forum state’s laws.” Decker Coal Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 805 F.2d 834, 840 (9th Cir.1986).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 6 F. Supp. 3d 1068 - Barranco v. 3D Systems Corp.