Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 Ga. 102 - Harper v. State

Harper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2023

17 state decisions

100200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · O'CONNOR v. Ortega · Mancusi v. DeForte · State v. Stephens · Gary v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he defect in the affidavit is that it presents the third party informant as being a family member, a truthful person, and someone without a motive to lie when the person who spoke to the informant had absolutely no way of knowing to whom he was speaking. In this case, unlike other cases where an anonymous tipster’s information has been corroborated, the information contained in the affidavit failed to provide any reason under the totality of the circumstances known to officers to believe that the information was from a credible source.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he failure of the Supreme Court to grant review... shall not waive the right to posttrial review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “... Georgia does not have a good faith exception to the search warrant requirement[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.