Blige v. Blige’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Scherer v. Scherer · Reynolds v. Reynolds · Mallen v. Mallen · Langley v. Langley · Adams v. Adams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We find nothing in the parties' standard of living before the marriage which would have put [w]ife on notice that [h]usband failed to disclose material facts so as to render the nondisclosure immaterial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he enforceability of antenuptial agreements is, of course, a matter of public policy”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“reading of Mallen turns Scherer’s disclosure requirement on its head. . . . [W]e have repeatedly recognized that Scherer imposes an affirmative duty of full and fair disclosure of all material facts on parties entering into an antenuptial agreement. [Cits.] ... In short, the “duty of inquiry” envisioned by [Husband] is incompatible with the duty of full and fair disclosure recognized by Scherer and its progeny. Finally, in Mallen , we did not rest our decision upholding the trial court’s enforcement of the antenuptial agreement on [the wife’s] failure to inquire into [the husband’s] financial status prior to execution of the ante-nuptial agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Quarles v. Quarles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.