283 Ga. App. 37 - Todd v. Byrd’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lau's Corp., Inc. v. Haskins · 176 Ga. App. 227 - Bridges v. Winn-Dixie Atlanta, Inc. · Cambron v. Canal Insurance · Davis v. State · 179 Ga. App. 712 - Williams v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]his practice is not approved by this Court and we decline to look in the record for matters which should have been set forth in the brief. Moreover, if we were to permit this practice a party could evade entirely the page limitations on briefs established in our Rules. See Court of Appeals Rule 24 (f). Accordingly, we have limited our review of [Ellison’s] arguments to those actually made in her appellate brief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A claim for tortious misconduct arises when a customer-invitee on the premises of the invitor for the purpose of transacting business is subjected to abusive, opprobrious, insulting, or slanderous language by an agent of the invitor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.