Baughman v. Baughman’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 2006 · most notably Seuss v. Schukat (1934), Brod v. Brod (1945)
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Zachmann v. Zachmann · Reed v. Reed · Wright v. Wright · Dodge v. Thomas · Dunlop v. Lamb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is the settled rule of law in this state that parol evidence to establish a resulting trust must be clear, strong, and unequivocal, and must establish the fact of the payment of the purchase money of the alleged beneficiary beyond doubt.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Nanny
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.