Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 Kan. 587 - State v. Walker

State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

112
cited by 112 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

112 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 112 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably State v. Johnson (2008), State v. Appleby (2009)

112 state decisions

620200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Wong Sun v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Jackson v. Denno · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) the accused’s mental condition; (2) the manner and duration of the interrogation; (3) the ability of the accused to communicate on request with the outside world; (4) the accused’s age, intellect, and background; (5) the fairness of the officers in conducting the interrogation; and (6) the accused’s fluency with the English language.” State v. Walker, 283 Kan. 587, 596-97 , 153 P.3d 1257 (2007).”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(2) The sentencing judge shall establish a base sentence for the primary crime. ... An off-grid crime shall not be used as the primary crime in determining the base sentence when imposing multiple sentences. ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the essential inquiry . . . is whether the statement was the product of the free and independent will of the accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.