State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2021
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. White · State v. Denney · State v. Rupnick · State v. Chatmon · State v. Belcher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As stated previously, K.S.A. 21-3504(a)(3)(B) criminalizes ‘soliciting the child to engage in any lewd fondling or touching of the person of another with the intent to arouse or satisfy the sexual desires of the child, the offender or another.’ (Emphasis added.) Notably, the second half of the statute differentiates among (1) the child, (2) the offender, or (3) another. The legislature could have easily written the first part of the statute to include ‘fondling or touching of the offender or another’ but apparently chose not to do so. Similarly, subsection (a)(3)(A) differentiates between ‘the person of either [1] the child or [2] the offender.’ The plain and unambiguous language of (a)(3)(B) — ‘person of another’ — requires a third party.” Johnson, 283 Kan. at 654 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““(a) Aggravated indecent liberties with a child is: (3) engaging in any of the following acts with a child who is under 14 years of age: (B) soliciting the child to engage in any lewd fondlingor touching of the person of another with the intent to arouse or satisfy the sexual desires of the child, the offender or another.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'if a crime is not specifically stated in the information or is not a lesser included offense of the crime charged, the district court lacks jurisdiction to convict a defendant of the crime, regardless of the evidence presented.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Aguirre
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.