State v. McKissack’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably State v. Deal (2012), 185 W. Va. 548 - Peak v. Ratliff (1991)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Koon v. United States · State v. Holmes · State v. Vontress · State v. Sanders · State v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Instruction No. 2 "The defendant is charged in count 1 with the crime of Attempted First Degree Murder. The defendant pleads not guilty. "To establish this charge, each of the following claims must be proved: 1. That the defendant performed an overt act toward the commission of the crime of First Degree Murder of Daniel Lozano; 2. That the defendant did so with the intent to commit the crime of First Degree Murder; 3. That the defendant failed to complete commission of the crime of First Degree Murder; and 4. That this act occurred on or about the 28th day of August, 2007, in Seward County, Kansas. "An overt act necessarily must extend beyond mere preparations made by the accused and must sufficiently approach consummation of the offense to stand either as the first or subsequent step in a direct movement toward the completed offense. Mere preparation is insufficient to constitute an overt act. "The elements of the completed crime of First Degree Murder are, as follows: "To establish this charge, each of the following claims must be proved: 1. That the defendant intentionally killed Daniel Lozano; 2. That such killing was done with premeditation; and 3. That this act occurred on or about the 28th day of August, 2007, in Seward County, Kansas."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"When a party has objected to an instruction at trial, the instruction will be examined on appeal to determine if it properly and fairly states the law as applied to the facts of the case and could not have reasonably misled the jury. In making this determination an appellate court is required to consider the instructions as a whole and not isolate any one instruction. [Citations omitted.]"”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether such inconsistency warrants the relief requested”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Craig
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.