Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 Md. 115 - Bowers v. State

Bowers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

150
cited by 150 later decisions
17
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

149 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 150 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably Ashton v. Brown (1995), Williams v. State (1992)

149 state decisions — followed in 17 states

420197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stanley v. Illinois · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Wisconsin v. Yoder · United States v. Harriss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 150 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “merely because it allows for the exercise of some discretion on the part of law enforcement and judicial officials. It is only where a statute is so broad as to be susceptible to irrational and selective patterns of enforcement that it will be held unconstitutional under this second arm of the vagueness principle.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A statute is not vague when the meaning of the words in controversy can be fairly ascertained by reference to judicial determinations, the common law, dictionaries, treatises or even the words themselves, if they possess a common and generally accepted meaning.””
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"Long before the advent of contemporary child abuse legislation, it was a well-recognized precept of Anglo-American jurisprudence that the parent of a minor child or one standing in loco parentis was justified in using a reasonable amount of force upon a child for the purpose of safeguarding or promoting the child's welfare.... So long as the chastisement was moderate and reasonable, in light of the age, condition and disposition of the child, and other surrounding circumstances, the parent or custodian would not incur criminal liability for assault and battery or a similar offense." Bowers, 283 Md. at 126 , 389 A.2d at 348 (citations omitted).”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.