Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 Mich. 667 - Austin v. Older

Austin v. Older’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
7
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2011

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

80193819401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · Zahn v. Board of Public Works · Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles · State v. Hillman · Thayer v. Board of Appeals

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is elementary that every intendment is in favor of the constitutionality of an ordinance and plaintiff has the burden of showing that it has no real or substantial relation to public health, morals, safety or general welfare.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““An ordinance requiring an immediate cessation of a nonconforming use may be held to be unconstitutional because it brings about a deprivation of property rights out of proportion to the public benefit obtained, but an ordinance prohibiting the enlargement of a nonconforming building is not subject to the same infirmity. This more limited restriction on the owner’s rights in the use of his property is within the police power and such ordinances have been held valid.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.