State v. Woods’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably State v. Kuneff (1998), In Re the Custody & Parental Rights of M.W. (2001)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Faretta v. California · California v. Beheler · Minnesota v. Murphy · Lefkowitz v. Turley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a trial court is not required to advise a defendant specifically of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation as long as the court makes inquiry of the defendant to the extent it deems necessary to ensure that the defendant’s waiver of counsel is voluntary, knowing, and intelligent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Insua“a reasonable person being interrogated would feel he was in custody or otherwise significantly deprived of his freedom.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Pinkley“For the Miranda protections to apply, the defendant must be subject to custodial interrogation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Pinkley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.