State v. Sawyer’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 1982
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Vestal · Linkous v. Millner · State v. Smith · State v. Nichols · State v. Mills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘The general admission of evidence competent for a restricted purpose will not be held r ever sib1 e error in the absence of a request at the time that its admission be restricted.’ 7 Strong N. C. Index 2d, Trial § 17. See also Rule 21, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, ' 254 N.C. 783 , 803. Obviously, the testimony to which these assignments refer was offered as tending to corroborate the testimony of Ward. Undoubtedly, if defendant had so requested, the trial judge would have given an explicit instruction to the effect that this evidence was competent for consideration only as corroborative testimony.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wood · State v. Sauls
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.