Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 N.C. 33 - State v. Gaines

State v. Gaines’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

121 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Rogers (1986), State v. Hardy (1977)

121 state decisions

75019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Stovall v. Denno · Moore v. Illinois · Foster v. California · State v. Goines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The standards enunciated in Brady by which the solicitor’s conduct in this case is to be measured require us to determine whether there was (a) suppression by the prosecution After A Request by the defense (b) of Material Evidence (c) Favorable to the defense .... ‘We know of no constitutional requirement that the prosecution make a complete and detailed accounting to the defense of all police investigatory work on a case.’ Moore v. Illinois, 408 U.S. 786 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 706 , 92 S.Ct. 2562 (1972).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Also, there is evidence which tends to show that the defendant confessed that he committed the crime charged. If you find that the defendant made the confession then you consider all of the circumstances under which it was made in determining whether it was a truthful confession and the weight you will give to it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he State is not required to produce lineup subjects who are in all respects identical to the suspect. If such were the rule, no lineup would be valid because no two men are alike.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.