Urbanski v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[w]e agree with defendant that the evidence offered was without sufficient foundation and therefore too speculative. " 3. Application of rules to facts of this case. (a) Facts considered by expert witness as the basis for his opinion. In this case the defendant was indicted for manslaughter in the second degree. The state offered evidence that defendant, after several drinks, hit the deceased with his pickup truck as she was walking along the left edge of the road. On appeal, defendant contended that the trial court erred in excluding opinion testimony of an expert witness to the effect that the "point of impact”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Stringer