Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 P2D 201 - Wade v. Padberg

Wade v. Padberg’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2003

5 state decisions

20195519601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shuler v. Viger · Halliburton v. Illinois Life Ins. Co. · Morrell v. Morrell · Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Kellum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘What constitutes abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in refusing to set aside a default judgment is dependent on the facts and circumstances surrounding each individual case. On appeal from such order this court will examine the record and determine therefrom if such discretion has been abused. Evidence in the present case examined, and refusal held to constitute an abuse of discre-' tion.’ ””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““An application to set aside a default judgment, filed after the term at which it was rendered, is addressed to the sound legal discretion of the trial court. Such discretion should always be exercised so as to promote the ends of justice, and a much stronger showing of abuse of discretion must be made where a judgment has been set aside than where it has been refused.’’ [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.