283 Pa. Super. 411 - Commonwealth v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2015
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Tucker · Burgett v. Texas · Commonwealth v. Clair · Greer v. Beto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 2116 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that “[t]he statement of the questions involved must state the question or questions ... This rule is to be considered in the highest degree mandatory, admitting of no exception; ordinarily no point will be considered which is not set forth in the statement of questions involved or suggested thereby .... ” And see Commonwealth v. Wyant, 254 Pa.Super. 464 , 386 A.2d 43 (1978); Commonwealth v. Eckel, 188 Pa.Super. 183 , 146 A.2d 750 (1959).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“counsel at the first sentencing proceeding was ineffective”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Chipman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.