¶1Defendant contends (and the State concedes) that the offenses charged under Counts 1 and 2 were facets or phases of the same criminal transaction for which a single sentence should have been imposed. Moody v. State, Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 909; Lietch v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 203. Accordingly, defendant’s convictions are affirmed but sentences on Counts 1 and 2 are vacated and the cause remanded with directions that defendant be resentenced in accordance with this opinion.
283 So. 2d 127
Colon v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 25, 1973
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1973-09-25
Relies on 248 So. 2d 203 - Lietch v. State · Moody v. State
Decided 1973-09-25