Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 283 So. 2d 553 - McDole v. State

283 So. 2d 553 - McDole v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
2
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 71 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably State v. Lawrence (2007), 336 So. 2d 1133 - Cooper v. State (1976)

1 federal appellate · 71 state decisions

41019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Furman v. Georgia · United States v. Tucker · Lego v. Twomey · Sims v. State of Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A specific finding of voluntariness is necessary to ensure that a judge has properly met this requirement. The necessity of such a requirement is particularly evident, where as here, a strong showing is presented by defendants in support of their contention that they were subjected to brutal beating coercing their confessions."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"... It is not for the jury to make the primary determination of voluntariness. Although the judge need not make formal findings of fact or write an opinion, his conclusion that the confession is voluntary must appear from the record with unmistakable clarity."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he only indication we have in the record of this case of the basis for the judge's denial of the motion to suppress is his statement that he would let the jury hear and consider the evidence as to voluntariness. The judge might have been referring to the fact that a jury may still find a confession to have been involuntary and disregard it, despite a judge's finding that it was voluntary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.