Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

283 S.W.3d 301

State v. O'CONNOR

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 2009

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2009-05-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2011

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-05-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Michael J. O’Connor appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of six counts of first degree statutory sodomy. We find that the trial court committed no plain error.

¶3 An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

/283/sw3d/301 · .json · Public domain