Fox v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 174th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery v. State · Johnson v. State · Moses v. State · Mozon v. State · Casey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“two of [its] sister courts have held that error under Article 36,28 is harmless where there is no variance between the direct testimony and cross-examination.” Id. (citing Phelps v. State, No. 01-89-00235-CR, 1990 WL 24898 , -4 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, no pet) (not designated for publication); Martin v. State, 732 S.W.2d 743, 747 (Tex. App. Fort Worth 1987), vacated on other grounds, 760 S.W.2d 662 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988) (examining the entire record to find”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas v. State“it tends in logic and common experience to serve some purpose other than character conformity to make the existence of a fact of any consequence more or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Ooa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.