Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

283 U.S. 783

Docket No. 581.

Morsman v. Burnet

Supreme Court of the United States

Argued February 27, 1931.

Decided March 2, 1931.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1931-03-02

2 counsel of record

Relies on May v. Heiner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1931-03-02

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1973 · most notably Helvering v. Hallock (1940), Hassett v. Welch (1938)

41 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions

37019311940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Per Curiam:

¶2The question in this case is that of the construction of § 302 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1924, c. 234, 43 Stat. 253, 304, a provision similar to that of § 402 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1918, c. 18, 40 Stat. 1057, 1097, which has already been construed by this Court, and, in this view, there being no question of the constitutional authority of the Congress to impose prospectively a tax with *784respect to transfers or trusts of the sort here involved, the judgment, of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is reversed upon the authority of May v. Heiner, 281 U. S. 238.

¶3Mr. Edward H. Blanc, with whom Messrs. Edgar M. Morsman, Jr., and Russell L. Bradford were on the brief, for petitioner.

¶4Solicitor General Thacker, and Messrs. Walter E. Hope, Assistant Secretary of the: Treasury, Claude R. Branch, and Clarence M. Charest, General Counsel, William T. Sabine, Jr., and Prew Savoy, Special Attorneys, Bureau of Internal Revenue, submitted for respondent.

/283/us/783 · .json · Public domain