¶1Mr. Sidney S. Bobbe for appellants.
¶2No appearance for appellees.
¶4Decree affirmed. Lehon v. Atlanta, 242 U. S. 53, 55, 56; Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 186; Brazee v. Michigan, 241 U. S. 340; Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U. S. 539.
283 U.S. 800
Docket No. 748.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdictional statement submitted April 20, 1931.
Decided May 4, 1931.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1931-05-04
2 counsel of record
Relies on Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co. · Harry Gundling v. City of Chicago · Lehon v. City of Atlanta
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1931-05-04
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1981
2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Mr. Sidney S. Bobbe for appellants.
¶2No appearance for appellees.
¶4Decree affirmed. Lehon v. Atlanta, 242 U. S. 53, 55, 56; Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 186; Brazee v. Michigan, 241 U. S. 340; Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U. S. 539.