Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

284 Ala. 183

223 So.2d 585

In Re Alonzo

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 10, 1969

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1969-04-10

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2008

6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1969-04-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

COLEMAN, J.,

¶1dissents.

MERRILL, Justice (concurring specially).

¶2I concur in the result insofar as it rests upon charges and evidence as to acts of petitioner while a practicing attorney. Also, I concur in that part of the opinion which holds that an impeached judge may subsequently be disbarred. I cannot agree that ordinary acts of a judge, such as continuing, hearing or dismissing cases, and rendering judgments, regardless of how perverse or wicked the motivation for these acts might be, are not judicial acts.

/284/ala/183 · .json · Public domain