Robert L. Bradford v. Emmet E. Harding’s Empirical Analysis
284 F.2d 307 · 1960
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably George G. Allman v. W. H. Hanley (1962), Murphy v. Kodz (1965)
16 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Martin · Tennessee v. Davis · Wisconsin v. Illinois · Yaselli v. Goff · Yaselli v. Goff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“administer not only the laws of the State, but equally Federal law, in such a manner as to paralyze the operations of the government.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[ejxcept as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Moreover, it (§ 1442,) rests upon far stronger considerations of policy.... 9 When an action of the sort specified in § 1442 is brought against a federal officer and others, even the most literal reading would permit the federal officer alone to remove.... For”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.