Glawe v. Rulon’s Empirical Analysis
284 F.2d 495 · 1960
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably United States v. Bohle (1971), Skogen v. The Dow Chemical Company (1967)
33 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1732
Relies on Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · Elzig v. Gudwangen · Atkins v. Ellis · Medina v. Erickson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It must be kept in mind that this Court will not concern itself with doubtful issues of fact which were for the jury nor with doubtful issues of local law as to which the trial court has reached a permissible conclusion. Webb v. John Deere Plow Co., Inc., 8 Cir., 260 F.2d 850 , 852. In that case we said (at page 852): ‘Personal injury eases such as this are essentially fact cases, and it is rarely that a party aggrieved by the verdict of the jury can, on appeal, successfully visit his grievance against the jury upon the trial court.’ See, also, Greene v. Werven, 8 Cir., 275 F.2d 134 , 137-138. It seems safe to say that as a general rule the verdict of the jury marks the end of such a case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“with our well-established case law that the violation of a statutory duty is evidence of negligence and not negligence per se.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“this Court cannot retroactively substitute its discretion for that of the trial judge, who had the feel of the case, * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.