Hirsch v. Bruchhausen’s Empirical Analysis
284 F.2d 783 · 1960
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 1999
9 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on Stern v. Board of Levee Commissioners · Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal · Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · Abel v. United States · Freeman v. Bee Machine Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ll defenses on the merits now properly go before the state court for definitive adjudication; our function has been merely to pass on the procedural aspects of the proceedings as brought before us.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“As to new parties defendant brought in by an amendment, a suit is begun only when they are brought in by the amendment and the service of the amended process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“apply to civil actions removed to the United States district courts from the state courts and govern procedure after removal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.