Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 F.3d 1 - Martin v. Applied Cellular Technology, Inc.

Martin v. Applied Cellular Technology, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

284 F.3d 1 · 2002

Citation profile

125
cited by 125 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 86 district ·

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from New Hampshire District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Maria Feliciano De La Cruz Erasmo Jimenez and Their Conjugal Partnership El Conquistador Resort and Country Club and Hugh Andrews · Straughn v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. · Kassel v. Gannett Co. · ERG, Inc. v. Barnes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 125 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “accept as true the well-pleaded factual allegations of the complaint, draw all reasonable inferences therefrom in the plaintiff's favor and determine whether the complaint, so read, sets forth facts sufficient to justify recovery on any cognizable theory.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]f the defendant had such information as would reasonably lead him to believe that the accused had committed a crime, it is immaterial that the defendant may have been actuated by malice or by motives that were less than noble in bringing the charge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a [person] of ordinary caution and prudence to believe”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.