Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 F.3d 1188 - Lee v. Ferraro

Lee v. Ferraro’s Empirical Analysis

284 F.3d 1188 · 2002

Citation profile

623
cited by 623 later decisions
4
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

165 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 623 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Vinyard v. Wilson (2002), Holloman ex rel. Holloman v. Harland (2004)

165 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

3460200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · Duncan v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 623 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[q]ualified immunity offers complete protection for government officials sued in their individual capacities as long as their conduct violates no clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    47 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Probable cause exists 'when the facts and circumstances within the officer's knowledge, of which he or she has reasonably trustworthy information, would cause a prudent person to believe, under the circumstances shown, that the suspect has committed, is committing, or is about to commit an offense.'”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) the severity of the crime; (2) whether the individual poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others; (3) whether the individual actively resists or tries to evade arrest by flight; (4) -the need for force to be applied; (5) the amount of force applied in fight of the nature of the need; (6) the severity of the injury; and (7) whether officers applied force in good faith or rather did so maliciously and sadistically-”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.