Bridges v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
284 F.3d 1201 · 2002
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Jones v. United States (2002), Dodd v. United States (2004)
26 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Duncan v. Walker · George Duncan Superintendent Great Meadow Correctional Facility v. Sherman Walker · Yates v. Gober · City News & Novelty, Inc. v. City of WauKesha
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to an application for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court. The limitation period shall run from the latest of&emdash; (A) the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Orange v. Calbone“The tolling provision of § 2244(d)(2) balances the interests served by the exhaustion requirement and the limitation period ... by protecting a state prisoner's ability later to apply for federal habeas relief while state remedies are being pursued.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stafford v. Thompson“that a petition for federal habeas corpus relief was time-barred,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.