Borgner v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis
284 F.3d 1204 · 2002
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc. · Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. Fox · Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio · In re R. M. J.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“These two surveys, taken together, support two contentions: (1) that a substantial portion of the public is misled by AAID and implant dentistry advertisements that do not explain that AAID approval does not mean ADA or Board approval; and (2) that ADA certification is an important factor in choosing a dentist/speeialist in a particular practice area for a large portion of the public.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`[THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY] IS NOT RECOGNIZED AS A BONA FIDE SPECIALTY ACCREDITING ORGANIZATION BY THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION OR THE FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“detail required in the disclaimer ... effectively rules out notation of the [AAID] designation on a business card or letterhead, or in a yellow pages listing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.