Aponte’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
15 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2024
15 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Paul v. Davis · Jenkins v. McKeithen · University of Texas v. Camenisch · Hannah v. Larche · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jerry T. O'Brien, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment . . . is [not] offended when a federal administrative agency, without notifying a person under investigation, uses its subpoena power to gather evidence adverse to him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harper v. Werfel“when governmental action does not partake of an adjudication, as for example, when a general fact- finding investigation is being conducted”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harper v. Werfel“[I]nvestigations conducted by administrative agencies, even when they may lead to criminal prosecutions, do not trigger due process rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harper v. Werfel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.