Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 284 F.3d 47 - Fraser

Fraser’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2022

4 district · 2 state decisions

110200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown Shoe Co. v. United States · Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States · Copperweld Corporation v. Independence Tube Corporation · Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority · United States v. Philadelphia National Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where there is no existing market, there can be no reduction in the level of competition. * * * Competition that does not exist cannot be decreased. The creation of the [Major Soccer League] did not reduce competition in an existing market because when the company was formed there was no active market for Division I professional soccer in the United States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “That a stockholder may be insulated by Copperweld when making ordinary governance decisions does not mean automatic protection when the stockholder is also an entrepreneur separately contracting with the company.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Arleen Freeman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated James Alexander, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, and Edward Y. Urata, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. San Diego Association of Realtors North San Diego County Association of Realtors Pacific Southwest Association of Realtors, Inc. East San Diego County Association of Realtors Coronado Association of Realtors Sandicor, Inc. Michael Spilger Greg Britton Joel Forrel Gwen Hovland Aileen Oya Marty Conrad Lauren Reiser Anita Alkire Phyllis Gritts Chris H. Lewis Lou Ann Williams Cory Shepard Sara Brown Joyce v. Amick Jerry Scantlin Walter Baczkowski Mark Marchand Stephen Games California Association of Realtors, Arleen Freeman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated James Alexander, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Edward Y. Urata, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. San Diego Association of Realtors North San Diego County Association of Realtors Pacific Southwest Association of Realtors, Inc. East San Diego County Association of Realtors Coronado Association of Realtors Sandicor, Inc. Anita Alkire California Association of Realtors, and Michael Spilger Greg Britton Joel Forrel Gwen Hovland Aileen Oya Marty Conrad Lauren Reiser Phyllis Gritts Chris H. Lewis Lou Ann Williams Cory Shepard Sara Brown Joyce v. Amick Jerry Scantlin Walter Baczkowski Mark Marchand Stephen Games
  3. “In section 2 cases, the wrongful act is usually one designed to exclude competitors from the market (e.g., predatory price, exclusive dealing).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.