Haynes v. Cain

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 2002.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2002-03-04

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2015

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Brandon Haynes v. Burl Cain

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-03-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Henry Clay Walker (argued), Walker, Tooke & Lyons, Shreveport, LA, for Petitioner-Appellee.

¶2 *605Catherine M. Estopinal, Asst. Dist. Atty. (argued), Shreveport, LA, for Respondent Appellant.

¶3ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶4Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

¶5BY THE COURT:

¶6A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶7IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.