284 F. Supp. 250 - Crane v. Hedrick’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 50 U.S.C. § 3806 · 50 U.S.C. § 3809
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Jones v. Cunningham · Estep v. United States · Orloff v. Willoughby · United States v. Seeger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f [the Government's] contentions were to prevail, the only way one in petitioner's position could raise his constitutional claims of wrongful detention would be by first committing a crime and facing the possibility of imprisonment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Habeas Corpus has also been consistently regarded by the lower federal courts as the appropriate procedural vehicle for questioning the legality of an induction or enlistment into the military service”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No 461
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.